November 22nd, 2012

UserPosted by: K S

Bill C-383 Transboundary Waters Protection Act

Larry Miller (Conservative)

This enactment amends the International Boundary Waters Treaty Act to prohibit the bulk removal of transboundary waters. Some definitions and exceptions that are currently found in regulations are transferred to the Act. The enactment also provides for measures to administer and enforce the Act. Lastly, it also makes a consequential amendment to the International River Improvements Act.

Full text available here

Bill Status: Third Reading

Media Links:

Council of Canadians

Owen Sound Sun Times

Bayshore Broadcasting 




This is a Level 1 issue. Guests (and higher) can vote and comment on this issue.

Reference: http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&DocId=5804358&File=24#1

Bookmark and Share    Contact us to Suggest an Issue.


Sort by: Date Added | Comment Rating

10 Comments:

User M Nicula
OPC Leader
PACT

1 year ago

A rare good Bill from the Conservative Government!

User F Wormald
Political View
PACT

1 year ago

I do not think this is a good bill at all. The following statement is contained in the bill; "Bulk removal does not include the taking of a manufactured product that contains water, including water and other beverages in bottles or other containers, outside a water basin. Up to 50,000 litres per day can be removed"

If 50,000 litres of water isn't bulk removal then I don't know what is!!..and that is an amount per day!

User G Hagar replied:

Agreed. This seems like a pretty significant loophole.

User R Ackert replied:

50 000 may seem like a lot but it really isn't. The average person uses nearly 400 litres a day directly and up to 4 000 litres a day indirectly. http://www.watergovernance.ca/factsheets/pdf/FS_Water_Use.pdf

A large farm likely uses 10 000+ litres a day at least but i cant find those stats anywhere.

these numbers may shock you.
http://www.wellingtonwaterwatchers.ca/2011/02/nestle-water-canada-permit-to-take-water/

the numbers are buried in this link so... its 60 000 cases of water per day. 12-32 bottles per case. 0.5 litres per bottle. 960 000 litres of water a day is extracted from a US spring and shipped out to store shelves.
http://www.maconcountytn.com/tour_of_nestle.htm

User M Crocker
Political View
PACT

1 year ago

I'm thinking that the party leader should have a political view. they should be trying to convince others to vote their (hopefully educated) view. Lemmings like myself don't want to check resources and back stories and and and... I (we) want to be told the truth so we can make the logical choice. it's to the public and the news to sniff out the holes in this plan so it can be voted on internally (OPC). It's ok to have the wrong view, you just have to be willing to change it. where is the bill for market over sight... I want the bill for stock market oversight!!! lets drag that cat out from under the bed. Here Kitty kitty kitty! To Bill C-383< Are we selling water? or are we just spilling it on the back roads to keep the dust down again. No clue! I plead ignorance for now and i abstain.

User C Johnson replied:

You've chosen the right course of action, I believe.

Also, you've raised a fairly good point. I wonder what kind of dollars are available to a political party, and if one could be granted money to conduct research. This way, we could have a team to collect information on backstories, relevancies and lay out the truth for everyone to see.

User B Odynski
Political View
PACT

1 year ago

It seems strange to ban exporting water. What's the justification? I think exporting water depends on the circumstances. In some cases we may want to share or sell our water to those in need. As always, it's a matter of weighing the pros and the cons and finding a proper balance in terms of regulation and control.

User D Mohr replied:

A for example that might illustrate the problem.

Natural gas from Alberta is distributed on the American stock exchange where BC buys it back to sell to their provincial customers. This is a result of the Free Trade Act.

Will we be exporting our water just to have to buy it back from the American Market?

User K Thrower
Political View
PACT

1 year ago

Definitely a good bill for the protection of our water and something that should be enforced completely but there must be clear trans parity in the entire bill with no loopholes . Once again the rights of the Canadian people must be the primary concern here

User S Cedar
Political View
PACT

11 months ago

Finally the conservatives have done something for our country…most of the improvements in our government have been made by the Liberals and NDP. This Bill is a great change to the act, so I vote yes.

Add New Comment:  


Login or create an account to comment.


Are you in favour of Bill C-383?

Yea
66% (49 votes)
Nay
20% (15 votes)
Abstention or No Position
14% (10 votes)

Login or create an account to vote.

Who Voted?
Note: A unique Voter ID is displayed in place of Name for members who have opted to make their profile private.

Leadership Teams
M Nicula voted: Yea
N Streker voted: Abstention or No Position
C Pavlis voted: Nay

Political Views
S Newman voted: Abstention or No Position
K S voted: Yea
K Poore voted: Yea
cd00692c3bfe59267d5ecfac5310286c voted: Yea
D Baldwin voted: Yea
daca41214b39c5dc66674d09081940f0 voted: Yea
0c9ebb2ded806d7ffda75cd0b95eb70c voted: Nay
B Longley voted: Yea
ebd6d2f5d60ff9afaeda1a81fc53e2d0 voted: Abstention or No Position
692f93be8c7a41525c0baf2076aecfb4 voted: Yea
6e7b33fdea3adc80ebd648fffb665bb8 voted: Yea
G Hagar voted: Yea
D Veilleux voted: Abstention or No Position
C Johnson voted: Abstention or No Position
A Sepp voted: Yea
D Scott voted: Yea
B Odynski voted: Nay
L Mooney voted: Yea
G Haas voted: Yea
J Watson voted: Yea
C Taylor voted: Yea
T Dyck voted: Yea
277281aada22045c03945dcb2ca6f2ec voted: Yea
J Gnemmi voted: Abstention or No Position
R Odynski voted: Yea
B MacDonald voted: Yea
V Wiebe voted: Abstention or No Position
S Cedar voted: Yea
M Proulx voted: Abstention or No Position
d72fbbccd9fe64c3a14f85d225a046f4 voted: Yea
D Mohr voted: Yea
82c2559140b95ccda9c6ca4a8b981f1e voted: Yea
J Kelly voted: Yea
46031b3d04dc90994ca317a7c55c4289 voted: Yea

Registered Voters
D Semple voted: Yea
A Bell voted: Abstention or No Position
    - Previously voted: yea
M Wood voted: Yea
    - Previously voted: Nay
T Vaisey voted: Nay
P Bombaci voted: Yea
R Hill voted: Yea
S Hill voted: Nay
B Humphreys voted: Nay
B Davies voted: Yea
C Lewis voted: Yea
S Gibson voted: Nay
D Duval voted: Yea
S Fraser voted: Abstention or No Position
L Carter voted: Nay
T Harnden voted: Yea
A Samson voted: Yea
d554f7bb7be44a7267068a7df88ddd20 voted: Nay

Guests
E Ibrakovic voted: Nay
J Packard voted: Yea
L Gregory voted: Yea
A Black voted: Yea
K Green voted: Yea
C Hanlon voted: Yea
E Marion voted: Yea
R mcmullen voted: Nay
K Tysick voted: Nay
A Rho voted: Yea
M CHABOT voted: Nay
J Dybka voted: Nay
M McCullough voted: Yea
d961e9f236177d65d21100592edb0769 voted: Yea
G Thompson voted: Yea
dd8eb9f23fbd362da0e3f4e70b878c16 voted: Nay
I Harsany voted: Yea
P Bisson voted: Yea
C Connelly voted: Yea
R Gee voted: Yea